“These last ones
worked only one hour,
and you have made them equal to us
who bore the burden of the day and the heat…”
--Matthew 20: 1-16
and you have made them equal to us
who bore the burden of the day and the heat…”
--Matthew 20: 1-16
Is Heaven a place of reward where if we have faith and if we
live right we will receive our prize –our just wage? Is that what this parable is about? Or is
Christ teaching us something else? Something about the Kingdom of God that
transcends our idea of “reward?”
Sunday at mass, the priest spoke of Heaven as the just wages
of those who have faith, and then he kind of wandered off on a tangent about
John Wayne (yes –that John Wayne) having a death-bed conversion. And there was a brief interlude in his homily
about death-bed conversions and how that is all it takes to earn your reward,
like those laborers who came only at the last hour and yet received a full
wage. This insight, troubles me. Not that it isn’t true, but that it feels
like the wrong approach to the lesson at hand. For instance, if a death-bed
conversion is all it takes to earn an eternal reward in Heaven –why on earth
should I bother with morality and devotion and self-sacrifice –especially in my
adolescences, and then there’s my twenties and thirties –when I’m trying to
explore and experience life (and maybe forties and fifties, when it’s time to
savor some of… oh dear…)? Anyway, shouldn’t I just wait for my death-bed and
offer myself to Christ then? To
paraphrase Jesus, there’d be a lot more celebrating in heaven with the
conversion of such a sinner (cf. Luke 15:7)!
So, it seems like a win-win! And yet,
I know that this isn’t the right approach.
Do you see why this parable has always troubled me?
There is something valid in the complaints of the workers
who have worked in the heat of the day.
They have borne the brunt of the work, and the owner will earn the
better part of his profit due to their effort. And yet, of course, the owner is
right: they have no reason to complain. They received the wages they agreed
to. Still… something else seems to be
happening here. Which, of course, is why I am still writing.
If we come at this parable from a different point of view,
we might learn something not only about the question of laborers, vineyards and
rewards, but also –and more importantly—about the Kingdom of Heaven.
For the kingdom of heaven is like unto a
man
that was a householder, who went out early
in the morning to hire laborers into his vineyard. –Matthew 20:1
that was a householder, who went out early
in the morning to hire laborers into his vineyard. –Matthew 20:1
This is a story not about just wages, or generosity or
envious workers; it is about the Kingdom of Heaven. To me this is key. We are getting a glimpse
of Heaven through the words of Jesus. Heaven is a place of generosity, and envy
has no place in Heaven, that is another of the key lessons I think we can all
agree on. But, for me, that envy is
still an important part of this story. And
why is that envy so important? Because through the laborer’s envy we catch a
glimpse of where the Kingdom of Heaven isn’t found. Clearly, it isn’t in the wages. And so, we must ask ourselves what image of
the Kingdom of Heaven is Jesus offering us here? I propose that it has something to do not with
the wages, and not with the number of hours the laborers work in the vineyard,
but instead with our acceptance of the call.
I think Jesus is showing us that the Kingdom of Heaven isn’t
about a reward we receive either for a life lived well or for a death-bed
conversion. If the Kingdom of Heaven is
a reward that we receive at the end of our life, then we are back to the
question of: why bother with morality or justice or sacrifice during the 4
score years allotted us? Why not wait and claim your golden ticket during your
last hours? Life will be easier, and you get the same wage as those who fasted
and prayed every day for 75 years –so, why not?
Why not? Because the reward isn’t paid at the end, perhaps it isn’t paid
at all. What if our focus on the
laborers and the wages was all wrong to begin with? What if the Kingdom of heaven was like a man
who went out and called people to work in his vineyard? What if the Kingdom of Heaven isn’t
symbolized by the wages but by the call?
And what if the laborers who are being envious are not simply a portrait
of people who missed the point, but a portrait of Christians who missed their
call?
Why should we take up our cross and follow Christ? Because if we do, if we endure this suffering
now, we will receive a great reward at the end?
Maybe… But what if it’s because that is the reward? What if the reward is
the Cross?
“Blessed are you when they revile and
persecute you,
and say all kinds of evil against you
falsely for My sake.
Rejoice and be exceedingly glad, for
great is your
reward in heaven…” –Matthew 5: 11-13
What if our reward for a faithful life lived well isn’t eternal
streets of gold, harp music and an all-you-can-eat buffet that always has fresh
crab-cakes and plenty of shrimp? What if
our reward is found in living that life?
What if the real lesson of this parable isn’t that we shouldn’t question
the generosity of God, but that we need to learn to recognize it? Whether you are waiting for a death-bed
conversion or going to mass every morning, I’m saying: don’t wait around in hopes of some future reward? The reward is at hand. Seize it. Live
it. If you look closely at the model of
Jesus, I think you will see: the reward isn’t in the wages –it is in the life;
it is in the laboring; just as the glory of God was revealed not on a throne,
but on the cross. The workers who were
envious were wrong, not because they wanted more than the workers hired at the
end of the day, but because they were too blind with envy to see what they had already
received. They had been given a full day in the vineyard. A whole day working
for God. If you had the choice, where would you rather be? Standing around on a
street corner waiting to be called? Or working in the vineyard of the Lord? What if the generosity the landowner speaks of
isn’t just revealed by the denarius he pays to the late workers; what if it
also found in the call he gives the first?